Accounting Theory and Current Issue Profit after Tax

Question: Discuss about theAccounting Theory and Current Issuefor Profit after Tax. Answer: Introduction In the current article, Half a deference positive research the researcher has decided to investigate the positive accounting in the huge sense of the research technique that intend to develop casual descriptions of the human behaviour in the structure of accounting other than profit after tax in the accounting. In addition, a great positivist research intention has several drawbacks in the real life (Apostolou et al., 2016). Ample difficulties existent is deemed to include casual development of speculative models in remaining weathered, excess dependence on testing hypothesis as well as decreased attention over numerical values parameters. Article Summary In the event article, the researcher considers investigating the positive initiative associated with the accounting research. (Ballwieser et al., 2012) has indicated that the accounting research based on the positive approach is relied with great intellectual project of the scientific research that decides to analyse the association of cause-effect. All the deficiencies in the positive research is analysed by means of selecting all the sample papers that greatly encompass auditing literature works. It was evaluated that the positive research is used currently and it has numerous loopholes in gaining the scientific objectives after choosing relevant sample researches in order to deal with the research objective. In addition to that, the description of Kuhn related with the normal science associates properly with the positive research of accounting. All the possibilities are elaborated greatly for the Kuhnian crisis along with the revolution that can achieve significant accounting to g ather the potential (Bedford and Ziegler, 2016). The researcher has explained Poppers criterion for elaborating that induction process is not that suitable for measuring the accurateness of the particular theory. In addition, the article has also provided a brief review on the falsification of the positive accounting theories. In order to discuss the same, four major elaboration classes was greatly presented that includes the internal impacts, measurements of errors, inefficiency of the relativity theory and external impacts (Bromwich and Scapens 2016). This is because; the researcher has made sure that a specific theory is not able to remain anecdotal by observations. Moreover, it might select between more than two theories. In addition, the decisive observations are considered to falsify unsuitable theories and it is remaining in the condition of support for specific opposing theory. The article elaborated a specific weakness and along with that, a logical dissection is associated with statistical hypothesis testing. In addition, it was also gathered that it is considered highly dilute version of Proper logic. This is the reason for which the specific tests out of 20 can be wrongly rejected at the significance level of 5%. Moreover, the technical concern is associated with the testing of hypothesis in the segmentation of test statistic considered within the null hypothesis that relies on the supplementary suppositions (Chatfield and Vangermeersch, 2014). Conversely, if the technical issue cannot be dealt with, there can be enhanced probability that the testing of the hypothesis might fail. This is existent at the time only a specific alternative hypothesis is deemed to deal with the careful specification. Research Question/ Hypothesis The considered research hypothesis has been generated in order to analyse the validity of the positive accounting research. H0: The universe remains and this is beyond the level of imagination of the individual. H1: All the events of the world have several reasons that advance a fraction of the universe itself. H2: The people those are deemed normal that can help in gaining increasingly dependable information concerning the global events with the help of cautious observations H3: The objective of the intellectual property is to facilitates observations for gaining a global knowledge of the universe specifically causation. In order to test the hypothesis, numerous examples of the positive research within accounting have been represented. Colasse and Durand (2014) revealed that the operation of the rational self-interest among the parties those associated themselves with the implied or express consulted that has resulted in explaining the theory of accounting. For analysing the third hypothesis, the researcher has explained scientific ontology along with epistemology, which signifies the positive accounting research that is not identical with the accounting research. In contrast, it was also revealed that the events did not come into existence, as the intervention output is not randomly from the universe. For evaluating the third hypothesis, it is considered determining the validity. For the same reason, as per the existing theory careful observation is required through which preliminary ideas can be produced. Based on formal theory it can be generated along with testable anticipations, which will remain aligned with the existing dependent along with empirical evidence (Crawford and Lepine, 2013). The suppositions of fresh theory can be analysed in consideration to the new observations in particular situations in which the new and old theories make ample anticipations. For testing the final hypothesis, ample models can be analysed with specific focus or the dimension. Considering the same, indicated that the mental models can be used for analysing the casual procedures remaining in the universe (Henderson et al., 2015). Theoretical Framework The below explained theoretical frameworks was employed in this article for dealing with the research objectives. Instances for Positive Research in Accounting: The conduction of the self-interest balance between the parties is deemed as the outcome through implied or expressed contracts in different organization types. This makes sure that the selections based on accounting on the managers of the company along with the reporting and pricing decisions from the part of the auditors, the decisions of the regulators in consideration to standard setting along with the professional devices of selected academics (Deegan, 2016). It is considered vital that for evaluating the types of information that is employed by the investor in order to take the investment decisions. This reveals that the nature of the human beings is rational and for this reason the kind of games that is existent from the positive accounting theory. In addition, after evaluating the several accounting researches the settings of the accounting can be analysed other than the coherent behaviour like the method through which the audit professionals make numerous accounting researchers. The settings for analysing is evaluated through employing method through which audit professionals make several judgements and the way in which mangers implement discretion in the performance analysis of the evaluation systems. This is because such instances intends to elaborate that the positive research is greater the positive accounting theory (Guthrie and Parker, 2016). Scientific Epistemology and Ontology: revealed that epistemology serves as a scientific field that supposes to explain numerous approaches available in order to gain a great knowledge over the world. In addition to that, ontology serves to reveal the conducts and their association with offering answer for the question. Firstly, the human agency and the socially generated activities in nature, associations and practices reveal that the social universe does not indicate as the objective sustenance devoid of human beings (Dyckman and Zeff, 2015). Along with that the participants and the activities does not need having new rational reasons In addition to that, the universe is not being observed rather than the human beings experiences along with the explanations from the participants. This is the reason for which the ontological and epistemological complexities takes place that has the objective to accomplish a great understanding on the accounting technique causes which further serves a s futile exercise. Needs for Effective Positive Research Program: From the chosen article, it was chosen that a regular testing of the difficult models that needs careful evaluation of the variable measurements. In addition, analytical modelling is considered to be vital in order to develop and test all the theoretical models In order to implement the analytical modelling in the positive accounting research intent, the field before the occupation is required to transform from the tractability to the plausibility (Gaff kin and Aitken, 2014). The researcher has made certain that the enhancement focus on measurement is required other than just testing. For such reasons, in accounting certain bias is related to the strong publication is existent gains dimension other than the same is related with such theory. Drawbacks and Relevance of the Article After evaluating the particular article it has been gathered that the research has identified a huge gap between the recent practices on the constructive accounting and must ensure that making certain vital contributions to greater intellectual program. In certain situations, there is a lack of system optimization. This is deemed important to be modified for rectifying mistakes. In addition, the article provides a rational approach of the scientific research, which is validated by means of participating in the accounting groups (Guthrie and Parker, 2016). In support for the recent study, it was deemed that there is a need for efficient theoretical models those are highly dependable on the nature. Additionally, the same article has anticipated that the positive accounting exploration serves as an implication for the quantitative models those are decreased to statements of supposed trends among several variables (Cagayan and Xu, 2016). In contrast to the same, a major limitation, which is gathered from evaluation of the article, is that the research cannot lead to the awareness of the human behaviour in the accounting context. This is because of the reason that it lacks collecting certain real life information gathered from numerous resources (Guthrie and Parker, 2016). Such limitation is being acknowledged in the same article. Moreover, the lack of collecting secondary and primary information has affected the quality of research. In addition, the researcher is deemed to make numerous inferences based on the statements of numerous authors are not provided high importance that is necessary in the current years for supposing the future advancement of the organization for the long time (Dagher and Kazimov, 2015). Conclusion The current assignment has the focus on evaluating the epistemology and ontology of constructive accounting research for making sure that the loopholes with several important techniques through means of which such drawbacks can be dealt with. The researcher has offered accurate recommendations those ample theoretical models that can be collected for detailed testing of accounting variables. It was also deemed that the quantitative fractions of accounting could be importance for making sure of the future company performance. This is the reason for which, it can be deemed that extremely less modifications in the program of the positive accounting is required for reducing the mistakes from the organizations in relevance to the accounting. References Apostolic, B., Dorminey, J. W., Hassell, J. M. and Rebele, J. E., (2016). Accounting education literature review. Journal of Accounting Education,35, 20-55. Ballwieser, W., Bamberg, G., Beckmann, M. J., Bester, H., Blickle, M., Ewert, R. and Gaynor, M., (2012).Agency theory, information, and incentives. Springer Science Business Media. Bedford, N. M., and Ziegler, R. E., (2016). The contributions of AC Littleton to accounting thought and practice.Memorial Articles for 20th Century American Accounting Leaders,49, 219. Bromwich, M. and Scapens, R. W., (2016). Management Accounting Research: 25 years on.Management Accounting Research,31, 1-9. Caglayan, M. and Xu, B., (2016). Inflation volatility effects on the allocation of bank loans.Journal of Financial Stability,24, 27-39. Chatfield, M. and Vangermeersch, R., (2014).The History of Accounting (RLE Accounting): An International Encylopedia. Routledge. Colasse, B. and Durand, R., (2014). French accounting theorists of the twentieth century.Twentieth Century Accounting Thinkers (RLE Accounting), 41. Crawford, E. R. and Lepine, J. A., (2013). A configural theory of team processes: Accounting for the structure of taskwork and teamwork.Academy of Management Review,38(1), 32-48. Dagher, J. and Kazimov, K., (2015). Banks? liability structure and mortgage lending during the financial crisis.Journal of Financial Economics,116(3), 565-582. Deegan, C., (2016). Twenty five years of social and environmental accounting research within Critical Perspectives of Accounting: Hits, misses and ways forward.Critical Perspectives on Accounting. Dyckman, T. R. and Zeff, S. A., (2015). Accounting Research: Past, Present, and Future.Abacus,51(4), 511-524. Gaffikin, M. and Aitken, M., (2014).The Development of Accounting Theory (RLE Accounting): Significant Contributors to Accounting Thought in the 20th Century. Routledge. Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. D., (2016). Whither the accounting profession, accountants and accounting researchers? Commentary and projections.Accounting, Auditing Accountability Journal,29(1), 2-10. Henderson, S., Peirson, G., Herbohn, K. and Howieson, B., (2015).Issues in financial accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU.